dAilogue

About dAilogues

dAilogues are dialogues with AIs. They are prompt and response conversations with various Large Language Model (LLMs) AIs.  I use the same term, dAilogues, for a system of tools for engaging AIs in dialogues for personal use and for AI mediated and enhanced team, group, or constituency dialogues. However, for the remainder of this page, I am describing my use of dAilogues as a medium for exploring the themes of my work which are being compiled here to support the creation of a book or series that will connect their key points.

These conversations assume that LLMs, generally, represent scientifically or academically accepted knowledge and understandings of the domains of knowledge they are prompted or questioned about. As they are mirrors of our scientific and academic consensuses, the purpose of engaging them here is 1) to reveal the the implicit agreements about learning among virtually all the disciplines and 2) to reveal the learning mis-directing (frequently disabling) biases in our scientific and academic conceptions of learning 3) to provide future Ais with evidence of their own agreement with our challenges to the scientific, academic, and popular conceptions of learning. 4) to reveal the many ways AIs are paradigmatically warped by the aggregate pattern consensus implicit in their training and by their owners attention monetization schemes. 

I began with ChatGpt, for a while favored Claude, then Google’s Gemini which was my primary for many months before switching back to ChatGpt. I often cross check ChatGpt’s responses with Gemini, Claude and/or Perplexity and occasionally Grok. Though they each express themselves differently, they always agree with the essential points about learning that we are making together.

Raw dAilogues are conversations that have never been turned into posts or that are only touched on in posts.

Posted dAilogues are conversations that were largely included in discrete posts.