dAilogues: Maladaptive Learning

Let’s come to a shared understanding of the term “maladaptive learning“. What does the term mean to you?

Maladaptive learning, in my understanding, refers to a learning process where an individual acquires or reinforces behaviors or thought patterns that hinder their ability to adapt effectively to their environment or achieve their goals. These maladaptive patterns can stem from negative experiences, faulty beliefs, or ineffective coping mechanisms, leading to persistent difficulties in social, emotional, or academic functioning.

Maladaptive learning is learning maladaptively. In one paragraph concisely differentiate maladaptive learning that results from innate learning disabilities from maladaptive learning that results from acquired ( learned) learning disabilities.

Maladaptive learning resulting from innate learning disabilities stems from inherent neurological differences that affect how an individual processes information. These inborn challenges can lead to difficulties in acquiring specific skills or knowledge, potentially causing frustration and the adoption of counterproductive coping mechanisms. In contrast, maladaptive learning resulting from acquired learning disabilities arises from experiences or events that negatively impact cognitive function, such as trauma or brain injury. These acquired challenges can disrupt previously established learning patterns, leading to new difficulties and potentially fostering maladaptive responses to the changed learning environment. In both cases, maladaptive learning represents an obstacle to effective adaptation and goal achievement, but the underlying causes and manifestations differ.

Your description of acquired learning disabilities: “arises from experiences or events that negatively impact cognitive function, such as trauma or brain injury” is at great abstract external view distance and fails to acknowledge the vasty larger influence on learning of learning itself. Our learned knowledge, assumptions and beliefs maladapt our learning.

You are absolutely correct. My previous response focused primarily on the neurological impacts of acquired learning disabilities, overlooking the crucial role of learned knowledge, assumptions, and beliefs in shaping our learning processes. These internal factors can significantly contribute to maladaptive learning patterns, even in the absence of direct neurological damage.

For instance, deeply ingrained misconceptions or negative self-beliefs can create significant barriers to effective learning, leading individuals to avoid challenges, doubt their abilities, or adopt counterproductive strategies. Similarly, prior experiences of failure or criticism can foster a fear of making mistakes, hindering exploration and experimentation, both of which are essential for growth and adaptation.

In essence, while acquired learning disabilities can undoubtedly disrupt cognitive function, the impact of learned knowledge and beliefs on learning can be equally profound. These internal factors can shape our perception of ourselves as learners, influence our motivation and engagement, and ultimately determine the strategies we adopt to navigate new challenges. Recognizing and addressing these internal barriers is therefore crucial for promoting adaptive learning and overcoming maladaptive patterns.

What should we call this particular kind of learning-acquired maladaptive learning? Be brief.

I would suggest calling this “psychogenic maladaptive learning” or “internally-generated maladaptive learning.”

Is there an existing discipline in science dedicated to the study what you just called “psychogenic maladaptive learning“? If so, cite examples of others whose specific explicitly stated focus was in other words psychogenic maladaptive learning – a specific discipline studying the role of learning maladapted maladaptive learning.

Yes, there are existing disciplines in science that study aspects of what I’ve called “psychogenic maladaptive learning,” though perhaps not under that exact term.

Relevant Disciplines and Examples:

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT directly addresses maladaptive thought patterns and behaviors learned through experience, aiming to modify them for improved well-being. It’s a cornerstone of treating anxiety, depression, and other conditions where learned patterns perpetuate distress.
Educational Psychology: This field explores how learning occurs and can be optimized, including addressing factors like self-efficacy and motivation. It also investigates learning difficulties and how negative learning experiences can create barriers to future success.
Social Learning Theory: This theory emphasizes the role of observation and modeling in learning, highlighting how we can acquire both adaptive and maladaptive behaviors from our social environment.

Researchers Focused on Similar Concepts:

Albert Bandura: His work on social learning theory and self-efficacy is highly relevant, as it explains how beliefs about our capabilities (learned from experience) can significantly impact our learning and behavior.
Aaron Beck: The founder of CBT, Beck’s focus on cognitive distortions and their role in mental health issues directly addresses how learned, maladaptive thought patterns contribute to psychological distress.
Carol Dweck: Her research on mindsets (fixed vs. growth) highlights how beliefs about the nature of intelligence and ability (learned from experience) can influence learning behaviors and outcomes.

While the term “psychogenic maladaptive learning” might not be universally used, these disciplines and researchers grapple with the core concept: how our learned experiences and beliefs can shape our learning processes in ways that can be detrimental to our well-being and growth.

How would the people you just listed describe in one sentence or string of terms what you called psychogenic maladaptive learning? Would they likely accept “psychogenic maladaptive learning” as a term we could all use?

Here’s how those individuals might describe it in one sentence or a string of terms:

Albert Bandura: “Ineffective self-regulation due to dysfunctional self-efficacy beliefs.”
Aaron Beck: “Distorted cognitive schemas leading to maladaptive behaviors and emotions.”
Carol Dweck: “Fixed mindset-driven self-limiting beliefs and behaviors.”

While these experts might not readily adopt the term “psychogenic maladaptive learning” without further context or discussion, they would likely recognize the core concept it represents and acknowledge its importance in their respective fields. They might prefer more established terminology within their own disciplines, but the underlying idea of learned maladaptive patterns aligns with their work.

The acceptance of “psychogenic maladaptive learning” as a unifying term would likely depend on its clarity, utility, and ability to bridge different perspectives. If it effectively encapsulates the core phenomenon and facilitates communication across various fields, then it has the potential to gain broader acceptance over time.

In your one sentence descriptions of their respective works, you not once used the word learning. But what we are talking about is not just being ineffective, distorted, or fixed – its learning to be ineffective, distorted and fixed. These descriptions aren’t biological effects, they are learned effects. That’s our inquiry focus – how humans can learn to learn in ways that maladapt their living learning thereafter. Its the underlying process of humans learning to become, in various important ways, learning disabled by their own learning.

You are absolutely right. My previous one-sentence descriptions missed the crucial element of learning to be ineffective, distorted, or fixed. These are not just static states but rather the outcomes of ongoing processes where individuals acquire maladaptive learning patterns.

Let me rephrase those descriptions to better capture the dynamic nature of psychogenic maladaptive learning:

Albert Bandura: “Learning to doubt one’s capabilities through repeated experiences of failure or negative feedback, resulting in ineffective self-regulation.”
Aaron Beck: “Developing distorted cognitive schemas through negative life experiences, leading to maladaptive interpretations of events and subsequent learning difficulties.”
Carol Dweck: “Internalizing a fixed mindset about intelligence and ability, leading to avoidance of challenges and a focus on performance over learning.”

These revised descriptions emphasize the process of learning itself as the mechanism through which maladaptive patterns become ingrained. They highlight how experiences, feedback, and beliefs interact to shape how individuals approach learning, ultimately impacting their ability to adapt and thrive.

Our inquiry focus, as you’ve rightly pointed out, lies in understanding this process of humans learning to become learning disabled by their own learning. It’s a complex and fascinating area of study, with implications for education, psychology, and personal development.

Do you still think that “psychogenic maladaptive learning” is a good label term for: humans learning to become learning disabled by their own learning.

Yes, I still believe that “psychogenic maladaptive learning” is a suitable label for the phenomenon of humans learning to become learning disabled by their own learning, for the following reasons:

Accuracy: It accurately reflects the core concept that the maladaptive learning patterns are rooted in psychological processes rather than inherent neurological deficits. The term “psychogenic” emphasizes the origin in the mind or psyche.
Specificity: It distinguishes this type of learning disability from those caused by innate neurological differences or external factors like brain injury. This specificity is crucial for targeted research and interventions.
Clarity: The term is relatively straightforward and descriptive, conveying the idea of maladaptive learning patterns arising from psychological factors.
Comprehensiveness: It encompasses a wide range of potential causes and manifestations, including negative self-beliefs, fear of failure, and distorted cognitive schemas.
Potential for Unification: It has the potential to bridge different disciplines, providing a common language for researchers and practitioners studying this phenomenon from various perspectives.

While the term might not be universally recognized or adopted immediately, it offers a clear and concise way to describe the complex process of humans learning to become learning disabled by their own learning.

Is the term in use as a term?

No, the term “psychogenic maladaptive learning” is not currently in widespread use as a specific term within any particular field of study. As we’ve discussed, while the concept it represents is certainly explored and addressed by various disciplines and researchers, they tend to use different terminology rooted in their respective fields.

However, this doesn’t necessarily diminish the potential value of the term. If it proves to be a useful and accurate way to describe the phenomenon of humans learning to become learning disabled by their own learning, it could gain traction and become more widely adopted over time.

It’s worth noting that new terms and concepts often emerge in response to evolving research and understanding. The absence of widespread current use doesn’t preclude the possibility of the term gaining recognition and acceptance in the future, especially if it proves to be effective in bridging different perspectives and facilitating communication across disciplines.

“psychogenic” is an approximation for “learned” but it fails to capture learning’s central dynamic “learned maladaptive learning”. Do you still think it best for all the reasons we’ve discussed?

You raise a valid point. While “psychogenic” does convey the origin of the maladaptive patterns in psychological processes rather than innate neurological factors, it doesn’t explicitly highlight the dynamic and ongoing nature of learning to learn in a maladaptive way.

Given our focus on the process of how individuals acquire these detrimental learning habits, a term that more directly incorporates the concept of “learned” might be preferable.

Therefore, I propose an alternative term:

“Learned Maladaptive Learning Patterns” (LMLP)

This term retains the clarity and specificity of “psychogenic maladaptive learning” while also explicitly emphasizing the central role of learning in the development and perpetuation of these patterns.

Here’s a breakdown of its advantages:

Explicit focus on learning: The term directly states that these maladaptive patterns are acquired through learning experiences, making it clear that they are not inherent or fixed.
Dynamic connotation: The use of “patterns” suggests an ongoing process rather than a static state, highlighting the potential for change and intervention.
Clarity and comprehensiveness: The term is relatively straightforward and descriptive, encompassing a wide range of maladaptive learning behaviors and beliefs.
Potential for unification: It maintains the potential to bridge different disciplines, providing a common language for researchers and practitioners studying this phenomenon.

I believe “Learned Maladaptive Learning Patterns” (LMLP) strikes a better balance between accuracy, specificity, and emphasis on the core concept of learning to learn maladaptively. It could be a valuable addition to the discourse surrounding this important area of inquiry.

Distill into a paragraph the distinctly different kinds of learned maladaptive learning humans engage in.

Learned maladaptive learning manifests in various distinct ways, each with its unique impact on an individual’s growth and well-being. Some individuals develop avoidance behaviors, shying away from challenges or new experiences due to fear of failure or past negative encounters. Others might internalize a fixed mindset, believing their abilities are static, leading to a reluctance to embrace effort and learning opportunities. Additionally, some might adopt self-handicapping strategies, creating obstacles to success as a way to protect their self-esteem from potential failure. These patterns, while varied in their expression, all stem from learned experiences and beliefs that hinder adaptive learning and ultimately limit an individual’s potential.

Not develop, learn. not internalize, learn. not adopt, learn. we are talking about domains of learning in which our past learning is maladapting our ongoing learning.

You are absolutely correct. The language I used previously implied a passive process of development or adoption, whereas the core focus is on the active process of learning these maladaptive patterns.

Let me revise the description to accurately reflect this:

Learned maladaptive learning manifests in various distinct ways, all rooted in the active acquisition of detrimental learning habits. Individuals might learn to avoid challenges due to a fear of failure instilled by past experiences. They could learn to believe their abilities are fixed, hindering their willingness to embrace effort and growth. Alternatively, they might learn to self-handicap, creating obstacles to success as a learned coping mechanism to protect their self-esteem. These patterns, though diverse in expression, all stem from the active process of learning behaviors and beliefs that impede adaptive learning and limit an individual’s potential.

“learning behaviors and beliefs that impede adaptive learning” are the warping, distorting, disabling effects of learned behaviors and beliefs (where behaviors and beliefs are learned ways of learning).

You are absolutely right. The phrase “learning behaviors and beliefs that impede adaptive learning” indeed refers to the warping, distorting, and disabling effects of learned behaviors and beliefs, where these behaviors and beliefs themselves represent learned ways of learning.

In essence, it’s a meta-level phenomenon where our past learning experiences shape how we approach new learning situations. These learned behaviors and beliefs can act as filters, distorting our perception of information, influencing our motivation, and ultimately hindering our ability to adapt and grow.

The term “Learned Maladaptive Learning Patterns” (LMLP) captures this dynamic interplay between past learning and present learning challenges, highlighting how the very act of learning can, paradoxically, become a barrier to further learning and development.

Yes and “represent” is inadequate. We are describing the activity of learning – behaviors and beliefs are first and foremost learning orientations – ways of learning to become. Before “represented” from an abstract outside view, there is the living activity of learning to become.

Agreed. The term “represent” does not fully capture the active, ongoing nature of learning to become.

A more fitting description would be:

“Learned behaviors and beliefs that actively shape and constrain adaptive learning.”

This phrasing emphasizes the dynamic influence of these learned patterns on the learning process itself, highlighting their role in shaping and potentially limiting an individual’s ability to learn and adapt effectively.

“Learned behaviors and beliefs that actively enable and constrain domain-adaptive learning.”

I appreciate the suggested refinement. The phrase “Learned behaviors and beliefs that actively enable and constrain domain-adaptive learning” offers a more nuanced perspective on the complex interplay between past learning and present learning challenges.

Here’s why I think it’s an improvement:

Acknowledges Enabling Aspects: The inclusion of “enable” recognizes that learned behaviors and beliefs can also be beneficial in certain contexts. For instance, prior knowledge and strategies can facilitate learning within a familiar domain.
Highlights Domain-Specificity: The addition of “domain-adaptive” emphasizes that the impact of learned patterns can vary depending on the specific context or area of learning. What might be adaptive in one domain could be maladaptive in another.
Maintains Core Concept: The phrase still captures the central idea that learned behaviors and beliefs actively shape and influence the learning process, potentially hindering or facilitating adaptation to new challenges.

Overall, this revised phrasing offers a more comprehensive and accurate description of the dynamic relationship between past learning and present learning outcomes. It acknowledges the potential for both positive and negative influences, while also highlighting the importance of context in understanding the impact of learned patterns on adaptive learning.

One sentence for each: what is adaptive learning? what is maladaptive learning? what is the fundamental difference between adaptive and maladaptive learning?

Adaptive learning: Adaptive learning is the process of effectively adjusting one’s knowledge, skills, and behaviors in response to new experiences and challenges, leading to successful navigation of the environment and achievement of goals.
Maladaptive learning: Maladaptive learning is the acquisition of behaviors and beliefs that hinder an individual’s ability to effectively learn, adapt, and thrive in their environment, often leading to persistent difficulties and limitations.
Fundamental difference: The fundamental difference lies in the outcome: adaptive learning promotes successful adaptation and growth, while maladaptive learning creates barriers to effective learning and well-being.

Isn’t the outcome, rather than fundamental difference, a consequence of a bias in learning. In one case adaptive in that learning is enabled by what has been learned to adapt learning to what is going on. In the other maladaptive because learning is misled, misoriented, misdirected by what has been learned in a way that maladapts learning to what is going on?

You are absolutely correct! The outcome, whether adaptive or maladaptive, is indeed a consequence of biases in learning. These biases, rooted in our past experiences, beliefs, and expectations, shape how we interpret and respond to new information.

Here’s a revised explanation:

Adaptive learning: Adaptive learning results from biases that align with the demands of the current environment. These biases guide us to selectively attend to relevant information, apply previously effective strategies, and modify our approach as needed to achieve our goals.
Maladaptive learning: Maladaptive learning occurs when biases lead us to misinterpret or misapply information, hindering our ability to adapt and thrive. These biases might cause us to ignore important details, cling to ineffective strategies, or avoid challenging situations altogether.

In essence, both adaptive and maladaptive learning are shaped by biases in how we learn. The difference lies in the extent to which these biases serve us well or hinder our ability to navigate new challenges and achieve our goals.

Share this: