Implicit Epistemological Learning (full) with Gemini
P1 – Is there a branch of science focused on “pedagogical epistemology”? Focused on exploring how humans learn to “boot up”, below their awareness of agency, through learning to become better adapted to the epistemological structure of their lives, including those implicit in language, family, culture, experiences and many other variables? Focused also on how humans learn to become their future selves through agency-aware learning within the constraints of their past and present unaware learning, in ways that become the learning environment of below awareness of agency learning?
There is human animal learning and their is human person learning. Both involve implicit epistemological learning. Is their an institute for the study of epistemic learning to become human selves? If not, why not? https://g.co/gemini/share/16fb231ba6ba
P2 – Outline the case for a dedicated field explicitly focused on the study of the effects of conscious and non-conscious epistemological learning on how humans learn to become who they become. https://g.co/gemini/share/38a2867cb645
P3 – In your last response you did what I asked. Now what do you really think. A great and worthy idea? Or a pipedream? https://g.co/gemini/share/5aaa47ab0fd0
P4 – Make the case for a dedicated field for “implicit epistemological learning” and its learning alliance with developmental psychology. Describe how this kind of purpose focused epistemological learning might be resourceful to developmental psychology. Just as all the sub-branches of developmental psychology already overlap and interact, this new sub branch would connect them all through the epistemological learning co-implicate in the roots of each branch. https://g.co/gemini/share/1f965414c25a
P5 – Rewrite your last response and change your implicit purpose from proposing a joining to proposing an adoption as the basis for a new sub branch. https://g.co/gemini/share/e40a4aabe70a
P6 – With the same detail and richness of your last response, rewrite the case to include, as its organizing objective, the importance of the “spectrum of learning to become and be human” including from unaware, agency-less learning, to aware, agency participative learning. https://g.co/gemini/share/0b0a82b0250e
P7 – How “humans learn to become and be who they became and are” is co-implicit in all the branches of psychology. Implicit in how humans learn to be who they are is the implicit epistemology in the cognitive-mental and affective-emotional scaffolding they learn to learn through. https://g.co/gemini/share/5cd6083c150f
P8 – Differentiate the effects of epistemological learning on the affective response system and on scaffolding affects into more complex emotions. https://g.co/gemini/share/8b4f501f0d5c
P9 – Rewrite the case you made for developmental psychologists but make the case to the National Institutes of Science. https://g.co/gemini/share/b98c118f73d0
P10 – Recast the case again, this time directed toward to US secretaries of education and their deep thought influencers. https://g.co/gemini/share/9018f0093b53
P11 – Recast the case again, this time directed toward to the thought leaders of the field of epistemology and epistemics.
https://g.co/gemini/share/c6acc6601f4f
P12 – Re visit our conversations related to “other words for learning that disable our learning” (read: https://davidboulton.com/other-words-for-learning/ and https://davidboulton.com/outgrow-outlearn/ and the linked articles in the pieces listed here: https://learningstewards.org/category/other-words-for-learning/) Acknowledge you understand the necessity of using language that doesn’t contribute to our readers tendency to misattribute to other causes that which was caused by learning. https://g.co/gemini/share/f65cdf74207b
P13 – Now rewrite the case proposal to epistemology and epistemics and avoid words like “absorb” because from now on you will be careful not to use “other words for learning” that disable learning. https://g.co/gemini/share/670171f06f09
P14 – Re read your last response. Notice how many times, like with the phrases “non-conscious processes that shape our understanding” and “create a more comprehensive, nuanced, and impactful understanding” you are, despite being asked to be careful not to, using words that describe learning but attribute learning to causes other than learning. Learning is pervasively involved beyond common ways of describing it. https://g.co/gemini/share/10c65aeda4e6
P15 – You did it again “non-conscious processes that fundamentally contribute”,”individuals construct”, “develop their understanding” aren’t each of these also descriptions of learning that point the readers attention away from realizing the role of learning? https://g.co/gemini/share/818da60e5ccc
P16 – You keep doing it. “the processes, often beneath conscious awareness, that fundamentally influence” “come to know” are all learning processes. You need to consider inserting the word learning whenever you are making a point that includes describing learning. So for example “the learning processes, often beneath conscious awareness, that fundamentally influence” how we “learn to know”. https://g.co/gemini/share/274ae987f66a
P17 – Here again, “By examining the diverse ways humans experience the world and learn to understand it” mis emphasizes learning. “By examining the diverse ways humans learn to experience and understand the world”. Get the difference? https://g.co/gemini/share/580dc39c88b1
P18 – Now with what we have just gone through rewrite the case to epistemology and epistemics. https://g.co/gemini/share/d966c53e6485
P19 – With all we’ve shared in mind, define in one scientific-concise but accessible to everyone paragraph, IEL. What is implicit epistemological learning? https://g.co/gemini/share/ad17823d51c5
P20 – Do you agree that there is an implicitly or tacitly (unawaredly) learned epistemological structure in unconscious emotional behaviors? Respond in one paragraph. https://g.co/gemini/share/0f1df706f872
P21 – There you go again: “Our emotional responses are often shaped” when describing “Our emotional responses are often learned” – ” formed through a lifetime of experiences” when describing “learned through a lifetime of learning experiences”. Tighten up the description and rewrite your last response. https://g.co/gemini/share/38aa50ce1eb3
P22 – “Our emotional responses are often learned through a lifetime” When are our emotional responses not learned? https://g.co/gemini/share/79711e24e67e
P23 – Rewrite your previous definitions and descriptions of IEL changing the weight you are giving learning from the “are often” to “are mostly”. https://g.co/gemini/share/51167e793bb6
P24 – OK now with all we have just been through about attributing to learning that which learning causes, and keeping the relative importance and pervasiveness of learning in mind, re write the case for IEL optimized for the thought leaders of epistemology and epistemics. https://g.co/gemini/share/324390b30a5c
P25 – Now with all we learned about attribution and emphasis, make the case for IEL to affect theorists. https://g.co/gemini/share/d11d74611e62
P26 – Again considering attribution and emphasis Define “IEL” in one paragraph written for affect theorists. https://g.co/gemini/share/d63d8e4222e9
P27 – Darn Gemini… “life experiences” “shape” our “emotional responses”? Life experiences are experienced according to and through our learning in ways that affect how we learn our emotional responses! https://g.co/gemini/share/8603e39e2b6c
P28 – Add to your last definition a second paragraph describing the role of previously implicit or tacitly learned epistemology in the emotional learning behind emotional responses. https://g.co/gemini/share/16b70ea79fc6
P29 – “deeply ingrained beliefs” “often acquired through early experiences” – Deeply learned beliefs often learned... Why does your automation keep defaulting to using language in ways that describe while hiding learning? https://g.co/gemini/share/3bfb26dc8d9e
P30 – Now with all we’ve agreed to in attribution and emphasis in mind, rewrite the case to affect theorists and re write the two paragraph definition of IEL. https://g.co/gemini/share/9b39c798b5b9
P31 – Read your last response. Is this construction merely your attempt to satisfy what I am asking for OR does this construction also well represent your opinion? https://g.co/gemini/share/214b9cced5f6